ASICS Netburner Ballistic FF MT 4 Review: Specs and Fit

Last updated November 3, 2026 · We may earn a commission on qualifying Amazon purchases. Disclosure

Quick verdict

  • Verdict: ASICS’s speed-focused mid-top, for players who want to move fast and also like a higher collar.
  • Best for: Players who value acceleration and multi-directional movement, and prefer a mid-top feel
  • Watch out for: ASICS’s US page lists no weight, and its 15 mm heel drop may feel different if you are used to a lower one
  • Key details: Mid-top, no-sew film-covered mesh upper, SPEEDTRUSS, FLYTEFOAM midsole, PRECISION SOLE outsole, X-GUIDANCE flex grooves; $155

Check price on Amazon

Research-based review, not a hands-on test. Specs and prices from ASICS US, read on October 31, 2026.

Netburner Ballistic FF MT 4 vs Other ASICS Options

FeatureNetburner FF MT 4Netburner FF 4Sky Elite FF MT 4Beyond FF MT 2
US price$155$145 list, $124.95 sale$165 list, $139.95 sale$130
CutMid-topStandardMid-topMid-top
ASICS’s focusSpeed and flexibilitySpeed and flexibilityJump powerControlled jumps, soft landings
MidsoleFLYTEFOAMFLYTEFOAMFF BLAST MAXFLYTEFOAM PROPEL
SupportSPEEDTRUSSSPEEDTRUSSRISETRUSSRISETRUSS
Heel drop15 mm15 mmNot listed5 mm
Weight on ASICS pageNot listedNot listedNot listedNot listed

What ASICS Says About the Netburner Ballistic FF MT 4

  • Mid-top upper: ASICS says it helps provide ankle support, with a lean back heel structure for ankle comfort.
  • SPEEDTRUSS: Designed to promote quick acceleration.
  • FLYTEFOAM with a 15 mm heel drop: Lightweight cushioning, with the higher heel intended to keep your feet ready to move.
  • PRECISION SOLE: An outsole pattern generated with 3D modeling, intended to balance flexibility and grip while saving weight.
  • X-GUIDANCE: Flex grooves for multi-directional agility.
  • Loop lacing and a no-sew upper: For a lighter, more secure fit.

MT 4 vs the Low-Cut Netburner Ballistic FF 4

On ASICS’s pages, the two share the same named technology. The obvious difference is the mid-top upper, at a $10 higher list price. If you don’t specifically want a higher collar, the low-cut Netburner Ballistic FF 4 is the cheaper way into the same design. Don’t buy the mid-top purely as sprain protection, because the evidence for taller collars is weak.

What We Could Not Confirm

  • Weight: ASICS’s US page doesn’t publish a weight, and the retailer figures we saw conflict, so we don’t quote one.
  • Changes from the MT 3: We found no ASICS comparison of the two generations. Our Netburner Ballistic FF MT 3 review covers the older shoe.
  • Buyer feedback: Amazon showed no customer-review summary on the listing we read, so we don’t report one.
  • Durability: We found no independent wear data.

Who Should Buy It

It suits players who prioritize quick first steps and direction changes but prefer a mid-top. Players who care more about vertical jump should compare the Sky Elite FF MT 4, and those wanting a lower heel drop and a lower price should look at the Beyond FF MT 2. All of them are covered in our high-top and mid-top guide.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the ASICS Netburner Ballistic FF MT 4 a high-top?

It is a mid-top. ASICS describes it as mid-top upper construction. True high-top volleyball shoes are rare, so this is about as tall as the ASICS volleyball range goes.

What does MT mean on ASICS volleyball shoes?

MT marks the mid-top version. ASICS’s pages for the MT models describe a mid-top construction, and the Netburner Ballistic FF 4 is the corresponding version without it.

What is the heel drop of the Netburner Ballistic FF MT 4?

ASICS lists a 15 mm heel drop. It says this works with the FLYTEFOAM midsole to keep your feet in a ready position to move quickly.

How much does the Netburner Ballistic FF MT 4 cost?

ASICS’s US site listed it at $155 on October 31, 2026. The low-cut Netburner Ballistic FF 4 had a $145 list price and was on sale at $124.95.

How much does the Netburner Ballistic FF MT 4 weigh?

We could not confirm a weight. ASICS’s US page doesn’t publish one, and the retailer listings we saw disagree.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *